Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | broco_lee | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Esper Pixie | ouranos139 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Esper Pixie | broco_lee | 5-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | afitzsimmons | 5-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | manny- | 5-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Auras , Azorius Enchantments , Bant Auras , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Unclassified , Unknown Archetype
Meta Performance Analysis
Entity Tracker ranks #217 out of approximately 310 cards in raw efficiency (top 70%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 52.8%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Entity Tracker is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 5.41 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 71.5%. Entity Tracker has a win rate of 64.9%, making it 9.1% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 6 | 94.4% | 5 |
| Scrollshift | Instant | 18 | 66.6% | 6 |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 8 | 64.4% | 4 |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 24 | 59.1% | 4 |
| Phyrexian Obliterator | Creature — Phyrexian Horror | 5 | 57.3% | 0 |
| Sun-Blessed Healer | Creature — Human Cleric | 10 | 56.4% | 2 |
| Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 32 | 56.0% | 8 |
| Break the Spell | Instant | 28 | 55.2% | 3 |
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 67 | 54.7% | 15 |
| Shrouded Shepherd | Creature — Spirit Warrior // Sorcery — Adventure | 125 | 53.8% | 25 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Entity Tracker than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 71.4% | 66.9% | +4.5% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 69.7% | 67.7% | +2.0% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 6 | 69.2% | 67.9% | +1.4% |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 8 | 67.3% | 67.8% | -0.5% |
| Spiteful Hexmage | Creature — Human Warlock | 1 | 6 | 62.5% | 63.5% | -1.0% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 12 | 64.9% | 66.0% | -1.1% |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 10 | 66.2% | 67.3% | -1.2% |
| Momentum Breaker | Enchantment | 2 | 11 | 64.3% | 65.5% | -1.2% |
| Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 5 | 9 | 63.6% | 65.0% | -1.4% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 66.7% | 68.2% | -1.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 349 | 23.2% | 48.7% |
| Azorius Auras | 58 | 90.6% | 38.9% |
| Dimir Bounce | 36 | 7.5% | 44.5% |
| Dimir Midrange | 32 | 1.6% | 49.7% |
| Bant Auras | 5 | 83.3% | 47.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.